A perspective on Zero Trust is to view it not just as a security framework, but as a cultural shift in how we think about access and trust within organizations. Traditionally, security models relied on defined perimeters, where anything inside was inherently trusted. Zero Trust flips this idea, not simply by assuming breach or enforcing least privilege, but by challenging the very concept of trust itself.
In a world of increasing complexity, from hybrid clouds to remote workforces and interconnected devices, trust becomes an evolving risk. By focusing on dynamic identity verification, continuous validation of intent, and strict segmentation at every layer of interaction, Zero Trust embraces unpredictability as a strength. It's not just about reducing attack surfaces-it's about ensuring that no interaction is ever blindly trusted, continuously questioning and validating every connection. In this light, Zero Trust is less about rigid control and more about creating fluid, adaptive security systems that match the complexity of modern infrastructure.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
------------------------------
badal bhushan
Distinguished Engineer
Walmart
------------------------------