The power of language models like ChatGPT to generate coherent and convincing text has the potential to greatly simplify the process of creating malicious code for both beginners and experts alike. This can lead to a higher number of attacks and more sophisticated attacks, which can have serious consequences for individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.
For beginners, the ability to generate convincing code with little to no prior technical knowledge can make it easier for them to carry out malicious activities, such as writing phishing emails, impersonating others, or spreading misinformation.
For experts, the ability to use language models to automate and streamline the code-writing process can lead to the creation of more advanced and sophisticated attacks. This can be especially dangerous in the hands of those with malicious intentions, as they can use the power of language models to carry out more effective and efficient attacks.
This is a potential area of concern that should not be taken lightly, as the ease and speed with which malicious code can now be created has the potential to greatly increase the number and severity of attacks. It's important to be aware of this risk and to take steps to minimize it through responsible use and development of language models, as well as through improved cybersecurity measures.
------------------------------
Satish Govindappa MS-Cybersecurity | MCA | CEH | OSCP
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Jan 24, 2023 07:47:38 AM
From: Jim Reavis
Subject: ChatGPT Research
Hi All,
I would appreciate the community helping us to think through what CSA's approach to research should be in light of the quick uptake of ChatGPT. I know ChatGPT is not unique in the world, but it certainly has reached mainstream and caught the attention of some of the smartest people I follow in our industry. I believe the attention it is currently getting is going to help us build better AI/ML security best practices and I think CSA should put together a white paper in short order as part of a longer term research effort. It seems to me the four dimensions are: 1) How malicious actors can use it to create new and improved cyberattacks, 2) How defenders can use it to improve cybersecurity programs, 3) How it can be directly attacked to produce incorrect or otherwise bad results and finally, 4) How to enable the business to use it securely.
I appreciate any input you have on how I am framing this and any anecdotes you want to share!
------------------------------
Jim Reavis CCSK
Cloud Security Alliance
Bellingham WA
------------------------------